Skip to main content

Palimpsest

I used to write a lot of poetry.  Over the past few years my writing has mostly been prose, a mix of creative non-fiction and fiction.  Once in a while, however, poetry can be used to say what prose cannot.

I found an old notebook that had old material in it.  The old material was embarrassing, and in pencil, so I decided to erase it.  In the process I realized I was creating a palimpsest.  A palimpsest is a document that has been erased so the paper can be reused for a new project.

This seemed to cry out for poetry.  Erasing my life so that I could reuse it.  Recycling myself.  I began to write short poems over the older work.  My palimpsest.

Maybe I had been bottling it up, because the poetry kept flowing.  It felt like a day of a thousand poems.  The reality was more like a dozen, but that’s a lot of poetry for one time.  Instead of intentionally crafting poems like some writers do (notably Poe was meticulous in his crafting), I write spontaneously.  



My poems come to me line-by-line.  Often they come unbidden.  This makes for a difficult time when someone has to be working all the time.  I can’t know when a poem will come.  Sometimes inspiration has to be put on hold so that I can get my work done.

Poetry doesn’t have to belong to the leisured class, although it would certainly be helpful to be as wealthy as Lord Byron so that one might indulge when the mood strikes.  We are likely beyond the days when one might acquire wealth for poetry.  It’s hard enough to find any publishers at all.


As a society, we are a palimpsest.  We erase that which has made us great in order to put new material down.  I miss the day of a thousand poems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dusty

  My, this thing is dusty.   My fans—hi, Mom!—perhaps believe me to have perished in the pandemic.   No, it was nonfiction’s fault. Since the pandemic began I’ve had two nonfiction books published and have written a third.   With a nine-to-five job something’s got to give.   Unfortunately it’s been fiction. Well, the groundhog didn’t see his shadow yesterday, so it must be safe to come out.   I shuffled away the rejection notes and began submitting again.   I’ve got a backlog of weird stories and maybe some new publishers have emerged? The thing is, don’t you just hate it when you’re in the mood to submit and some lit journal has its window for submissions firmly shut?   My last story, “ The Hput, ” was published about three years ago.   Oh, I’ve submitted since then, but with no traction.   Well, it is winter. I’ve got a lot of stories lined up.   I’ve been sending them out again, dreaming of making a dime at what I love doing best.   When you’ve been writing for half a century, you l

Too Much Writing?

  Has this ever happened to you?   Have you written a story that you’ve completely forgot?   Not only completely forgotten, but made unfindable?   I play games with my stories and sometimes the joke’s on me. Okay, I suffer from graphomania.   I write constantly.   I do try to keep organized—I use a spreadsheet that has all my submissions on it.   It has rejection/acceptance dates (mostly rejection).   Lots of information. I decided to list on it every story, whether finished or in process.   There are far too many (mostly in process).   When I finish a story I often submit it.   If I get burned, I’m shy about resubmitting.   I often rewrite at this stage.   Then, when I feel brave enough, I try again. The spreadsheet is color-coded.   There, in the color that indicates finished and ready to submit is a story cryptically titled “The Password.”   I don’t remember this story.   I can’t recall what it was about or why I thought it was ready to publish. Looking through my electronic files,

The Same Old Story

After a story is rejected from a literary magazine—a rather frequent occurrence—I always revise it.  For stories rejected half a dozen or more times—a rather frequent occurrence—the stories can shift substantially.   In a version of the old saw that “this is the axe used by George Washington to chop down the cherry tree; it has had five new handles and three new heads,” I wonder if the story is the same after such revision.  I write in the flush of inspiration.  The story comes to me roughly complete. The literati say “no,” and I assume the fault must be my own.  I knuckle down and start trying to revise to their liking.  The action changes.  The ending changes.  The characters change.  Is it the same story? Is the fault that my addled brain seems to have trouble telling a story someone wants to read?  Is it the curse of an internet that makes writers of anyone with fingers to type?  I started writing fiction four decades ago.  If I’d tried to start publishing then, perhap