Skip to main content

Who's Wagging What?

A brand new notebook.  It's a thing of such exquisite beauty that I begin to weep.  The pen in my hand is nervous, like a first date.  Once I begin to write, this notebook will never be the same.

The ideas flow, partly based on the medium chosen to channel them.  Any writer knows this.
 
Growing up before word processors or home computers, in a time when even typewriters were too expensive for families like mine, I came to adore paper.  In almost a mystical sense, I feel a growing thrill when faced with completely blank pages.  Writing can be so visceral, so physical.  I can get lost in it, as if I'm following the folds in my gray matter to places I never knew I had.


 
The results, whether any publishers like them or not, prove that I am a writer.  I have gone some place unexplored and have brought something new to light.  It may not survive.  No museum may want it.  It is, however, now part of the universe.
 
I suppose that's why I found a recent seminar so disturbing.  An expert in XML (the coding used for ebooks) was saying how the goal was to change the way authors do things.  They should, the speaker averred, write in XML.  Otherwise, publishers can't really get access to what's in their brains.
 
It may not have been coincidence that I felt ill later that night.  Such a misunderstanding of the craft of writing by a technician.  A technician for a powerful publisher, no less.  Would we have no fear walking into Poe's darkened study and saying, "lighten it up a little, would you?"
 
"Hey, Herman, wouldn't this story work better if the Pequod were a corporation and Moby Dick were a free-thinker?  

"And while you're at it Miss Bronte, ditch the umlaut and brighten up Thornfield a bit."

I'm sure they mean no harm, but our technical advisors will forever change the way we write, if we let them.  Even this laptop, at times, feels like a tremendous burden.
 
Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.  Sameness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dusty

  My, this thing is dusty.   My fans—hi, Mom!—perhaps believe me to have perished in the pandemic.   No, it was nonfiction’s fault. Since the pandemic began I’ve had two nonfiction books published and have written a third.   With a nine-to-five job something’s got to give.   Unfortunately it’s been fiction. Well, the groundhog didn’t see his shadow yesterday, so it must be safe to come out.   I shuffled away the rejection notes and began submitting again.   I’ve got a backlog of weird stories and maybe some new publishers have emerged? The thing is, don’t you just hate it when you’re in the mood to submit and some lit journal has its window for submissions firmly shut?   My last story, “ The Hput, ” was published about three years ago.   Oh, I’ve submitted since then, but with no traction.   Well, it is winter. I’ve got a lot of stories lined up.   I’ve been sending them out again, dreaming of making a dime at what I love doing best...

Creative Righting

  Rejection of my writing is a rejection of my imaginative world.   That’s why I was cheered by the acceptance of one of my stories this week.   That makes number 31. I’ve been working on a lot of fiction lately, even as nonfiction book number 6 is going to press.   The ideas are still there, and bizarre as ever, but publishing venues just aren’t welcoming. The other day I had lunch with a professor whose wife is also a professor.   She just had her first novel published, and so he pointed me to her indie publisher.   I went to their website to learn that they’re closed to submissions.   I have to admit that my latest accepted story, “Creative Writing Club,” was probably given the green light because I know the editor.   That seems like a pretty dicey way to get any notice, doesn’t it?   You have to know the right people even in the low circulation world. My fiction is difficult to classify.   It’s got speculative elements to it.   ...

Patterns

  There’s a pattern I’m noticing.   For fiction publishers.   Even if you aim low you’ll find it a struggle.   Part of the reason is the pattern. Lots of websites list publishers.   The smaller, hungrier presses either eventually close or get to a place where they require an agent to get in.   That’s the kiss of death. Although my stories have won prizes, and been nominated for prizes, I can’t get an agent interested.   I’ve queried well over a hundred, so the agent route is one of diminishing returns.   This too is a pattern. Back to the smaller presses.   I check many lists.   What I write, you see, is highly idiosyncratic.   It’s literary but it’s weird.   Publishers don’t know what to do with it.   If a smaller press published stuff like this, I’d find it. The pattern includes writers who never get discovered.   Ironically, a number of editors of fiction literary magazines (mostly online) tell me they enjoy my wor...