Skip to main content

Nothing Like It

 There’s no feeling like it.  Finishing a story that you know is good.  You’re ready to send it to a publisher right away.  But then you hesitate.


You’ve received so many rejection notes but each one stabs you afresh when another one comes.  Still, you know this story’s good.  You’ve managed to do something different than you usually do.  Will they, can they appreciate it for what it is?


I’ve managed to have thirty stories published—averaging one per every two years I’ve been on this planet.  The rejection numbers are beyond a one-to-one correspondence.  And yet, I know this story’s good.


Fiction publishing’s all about convincing some editor you don’t know that you do know.  You know your own writing.  I write many stories that aren’t publishable.  Writing’s that way.  When I do manage a good one I’m like a kid on Christmas morning.


It takes thick skin, they say, to be a writer.  My question is should it?  Of course, there are lots of would-be writers out there.  You’d think a guy my age might have some observations about life to share.  In fictional form.





There’s always an element of struggle to it.  Quite often I go back and re-edit my stuff.  I edit stories before ever submitting them.  I do tend to work in isolation, so nobody else reads them before I move them on.  That’s one burden of using a nom de guerre.  (People I know wouldn’t be accepting of my fictional thoughts.)


I know lots of editors—mostly of nonfiction.  One thing they tell me is that other eyes should see writing.  Often those eyes end up being of the editor her or himself.  And if they spot too much wrong, the rejection letter follows naturally enough.


I sometimes wonder if they’ve forgotten the excitement.  The thrill of writing something they know is good.  There’s nothing like it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dusty

  My, this thing is dusty.   My fans—hi, Mom!—perhaps believe me to have perished in the pandemic.   No, it was nonfiction’s fault. Since the pandemic began I’ve had two nonfiction books published and have written a third.   With a nine-to-five job something’s got to give.   Unfortunately it’s been fiction. Well, the groundhog didn’t see his shadow yesterday, so it must be safe to come out.   I shuffled away the rejection notes and began submitting again.   I’ve got a backlog of weird stories and maybe some new publishers have emerged? The thing is, don’t you just hate it when you’re in the mood to submit and some lit journal has its window for submissions firmly shut?   My last story, “ The Hput, ” was published about three years ago.   Oh, I’ve submitted since then, but with no traction.   Well, it is winter. I’ve got a lot of stories lined up.   I’ve been sending them out again, dreaming of making a dime at what I love doing best.   When you’ve been writing for half a century, you l

The Same Old Story

After a story is rejected from a literary magazine—a rather frequent occurrence—I always revise it.  For stories rejected half a dozen or more times—a rather frequent occurrence—the stories can shift substantially.   In a version of the old saw that “this is the axe used by George Washington to chop down the cherry tree; it has had five new handles and three new heads,” I wonder if the story is the same after such revision.  I write in the flush of inspiration.  The story comes to me roughly complete. The literati say “no,” and I assume the fault must be my own.  I knuckle down and start trying to revise to their liking.  The action changes.  The ending changes.  The characters change.  Is it the same story? Is the fault that my addled brain seems to have trouble telling a story someone wants to read?  Is it the curse of an internet that makes writers of anyone with fingers to type?  I started writing fiction four decades ago.  If I’d tried to start publishing then, perhap

Gothica

The other day I asked a friend to define “gothic.”  Heavy, dark, supernatural—these were a few of the words suggested.  When autumn comes my thoughts turn gothic, and I’m always looking for good gothic things to read. I have blogged in the past about how reading literature that isn’t great is good.  I’m serious about that.  You can learn a lot by reading poor writing.  Some gothic literature is more the former than the latter.  Like Dark Shadows novels. Dark Shadows was running on daytime television when I was a child.  As a teen I began to read the novelizations, by Marilyn Ross, whenever I could find them.  Belles lettres they’re not.  Gothic, most decidedly so.  That’s why I keep coming back to them.  They aren’t scary.  In fact, they’re formulaic and predictable.  But so, so gothic. Spooky mansions, the Maine woods, forlorn vampire, faded wealth.  Even, yes, dark shadows.  The stories create a mood I find difficult to locate elsewhere. Inspired by the most r